All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A 1) There is no fact that the Defendant destroyed the damage of property by destroying beer’s disease or destroying beer’s air conditioners on the ground of the air conditioners, as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the lower judgment, as indicated in the lower judgment.

B) The Defendant of the injury was assaulted by B and H, and during that process, there was only a fact that H was fluence, and there was no injury to H as stated in the lower judgment’s judgment. 2) The lower court’s sentence of unfair sentencing (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B’s punishment (fine 5 million won) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on Defendant A’s appeal

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged in accordance with the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court as to the assertion of mistake of facts, it is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant destroyed beer’s disease by destroying beer and beer the beer’s body and destroying beer on the ground of the date and place indicated in the facts constituting a crime as indicated in the lower judgment, and destroying the beer’s property on the part of the victim’s F.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged is justified, and the defendant's allegation of mistake is without merit.

① The witness B stated that “the Defendant did not directly see the act that he was fluoring the beer’s disease and shaking the air conditioners: Provided, That the Defendant and H was able to brut the air condition with the air conditioners and the air conditioners, and the air conditioners were seriously shaken while fighting the body, and the beer in the air conditioners exceeded the beer’s disease in the air conditioners, and there was a big scacker decrease in the air condition.”

② The police officer stated that “The Defendant was spacker who was in the process of the H and a spacker to the fracker and was in the process of the fracker fracker’s body with two hands and was in the process of the fracker’s spacker and was in the process of the fracker’s body.”