Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant committed the first police officer on December 2, 2013, who managed personal information, from around December 2, 2012 to January 24, 2014, at an incorporated association E of the D University Life Science Museum 1208 located in Ansan-si, as a team leader, and the person who manages personal information should not acquire personal information by fraud or other improper means or methods.

Nevertheless, on December 2, 2013, the Defendant arbitrarily perused the file on December 2, 2013, which contains personal information, such as the name, resident registration number, etc. of the victim F’s personal spool stored in the personal spool of the victim F’s business-use computer at the early E office, and acquired it by printing it using a printer to use it as evidence against the victim’s disadvantage.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired personal information by illegal means.

2. On January 23, 2014, the Defendant, as described in the preceding paragraph, may not divulge personal information that he/she became aware of in the course of performing his/her duties.

Nevertheless, around January 23, 2014, the defendant was found to be dismissed in the defendant's residence located G 304 at Ansan-si, G 304, and the defendant's father, his father (the non-detained prosecution on January 30, 2014) and the defendant's dismissal.

The labor contract and the resume in which personal information, such as the victim F's name, resident registration number, etc., known in the course of performing the duties of the above E, were delivered to the above H.

Accordingly, the defendant disclosed personal information that he came to know in the course of his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of F;

1. A copy of each police statement made to F, I, and J;

1. The Defendant, a copy of a labor contract, and a resume, committed the above actions for the benefit of E, and therefore, is justifiable. However, according to the evidence above, the Defendant was dismissed.