The defendant shall be innocent.

Indictment

1. On April 24, 2018, the Defendant appeared as a witness and took an oath on the date of trial of the case, including fraud, etc., Suwon District Court 2017Da7771.

Around September 2015, the Defendant testified that, “I would like to this end, I would like to this end, and I would like to this end, I would like to this end. I would like to say, “I would like to this end, I would like to this end. I would like to this end. I would like to say, “I would like to this end, I would like to this end. I would like to have come to this end. I would like to this end. I would like to say that I would have come to this end.”

However, there was no fact that B had requested the defendant to furnish the guarantee, and there was no fact that B provided the defendant with the intention to complete the payment after the month.

Nevertheless, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. The Defendant testified at the same place of inspection that “A witness will open the Etete mobile phone because the document needs to be opened, and the resident registration certificate, certificate of personal seal impression, certificate of health insurance premium payment, etc., the witness will be issued to whom the above document should be known, and the lending company will be given notice of the fax number and sent the notice to the public by facsimile.”

However, B did not know where the lending company was located, and there was no facsimile number known to the defendant.

Nevertheless, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

3. The Defendant sent this document to the public prosecutor at the same place and later made a call confirming the guarantor at the lending company as if he or she was the son E, which is the need to be followed. B’s instructions and instructions are given to the public prosecutor, and “In this case, B shall be notified that this call would be given.”

(c).