logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2019.06.11 2019고단267
마약류관리에관한법률위반(마약)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (narcotics) and the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics (psychotropic) is not a person handling narcotics

On July 15, 2018, from around 00:00 to around 01:30, the Defendant used the site of the tunnel in the vicinity of Changwon Mucompo-gu “C”, and used the drug name ethyl solution solution containing the drug name, which is a drug delivered from D’s death, together with the alcohol, as a means of taking the drug name ethyl solution containing a psychotropic drug ingredient, and the drug name ethyl solution containing a shot solution, which is a psychotropic drug, was administered in the way of taking the drug name ethyl solution together with the alcohol.

2. No person who violates the Road Traffic Act shall drive a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or influence of drugs;

On July 15, 2018, at around 02:00, the Defendant driven a hived car in a state where approximately 2.3km from the front of the tunnel construction site to the front road located in the same Gu E from around 02:03m of the same day to the front road located in the same Gu E, from around 10:16, to around 10:8m from the front road of the foregoing F to the front road of the same Gu, and from around 10.8m from around 10.8m to the front road of the same Gu, the Defendant used a drug name container containing narcotics containing narcotics-propine ingredients, psychotropic ingredients, psychotropic drug ethyl solution containing psychotropic drugs, and stroke-morm, which might not drive normally, as described in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant was driving a motor vehicle under the condition that he could not drive a motor vehicle normally due to drugs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Requests for appraisal;

1. Reports on internal investigation (verification as to whether they are designated as narcotics, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (in relation to the attachment, etc. of next data);

1. Article 1 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, etc. by Which criminal facts are applicable and punishment is selected;

arrow