logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.30 2016고단1151
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant insultd on March 12, 2016, at around 20:45, D’s top of D’s pharmacy in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, D(C).

“The economy is in this shape because the victim F, the police officer of the Suwon E District Police Station, who was dispatched upon the report of 112, was drunk to the Defendant F, who was under the influence of Defendant F, while working for the Defendant.”

“Is theme to see” and “Is theme, Is theme,”

G Do so doing

C Ma fear A, Neas

The death or death of each of them shall be discarded.

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by “......”

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, abused the Defendant, who was a policeman belonging to the said E District, who took a bath that H would not take a bath against the Defendant, and immediately speaked, with the defect that “I saw, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, etc., of the said H’s breath, fright and fright, and fright, frighted the b

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of mental and physical weakness under Article 62(1) of the suspended execution of the Criminal Act, the Defendant and his defense counsel had been in a state of mental and physical weakness by drinking at the time of the instant crime.

Therefore, according to the records, even though the defendant was aware that he had drinking at the time of each of the above crimes, the defendant is above, considering the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the means and methods of the crime of this case, and the circumstances before and after the crime of this case.

arrow