1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of (State)B.

1. On December 2016, the Defendant: (a) stated “2016” in the issuance number column of the above local tax payment certificate; (b) stated “2016”; (c) January 31, 2017; and (d) on the date column of the applicant column, “20 November 2016, 2016” on the date of the applicant column; and (c) stated “the validity period and the issue date” in the column of the certificate, “No. 31 December 2016, 2016,” stating that “No. 31 December 2016, 2016.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant has forged one copy of local tax payment certificate in the name of the head of the Gun, a public document.

2. On December 8, 2016, the Defendant issued a false local tax payment certificate to a person who is not aware of the forgery of the above local tax payment certificate in order to enter into a supply contract, such as the Nonghyup Distribution Office in Busan, the Busan, the U.S., the U.S., the distribution office of the KAF, and to enter into the supply contract, such as the distribution and re-distribution of the KAF. In order to enter into the contract, the Defendant sent the forged local tax payment certificate to a person who is not aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, exercised one copy of the local tax payment certificate, which is a forged official document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing a written accusation and a certificate of local tax payment;

1. Relevant Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the fact that the criminal defendant has no criminal record and is recognized as a mistake);