logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.04.25 2017고단5659
폭행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Defendant A is a company member; the victim B is a married couple with the victim on March 22, 2014.

Defendant,

A. From around 01:00 to around 02:00 on August 30, 2017, the injured party in Gwangju-si apartment C apartment 106 dong 1607 dong 1607 dong 1607 dong 1607 dong 1, a mobile phone of the Defendant, was locked by reporting the Defendant’s sexually related dynamic image with other women on the Defendant’s mobile phone so that he/she was locked, and was unlocked, he/she exceeded the inner diameter, and walked with the shoulder and shot, and was in the cooling.

The water that was in the scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic and the aquatic scopic scopic scopic in the head.

B. From around 20:30 on September 5, 2017 to 20:45, during the Defendant’s 106-dong 1607 dwelling space in Gwangju-si, a victim, who provided meals on the ground that he/she would have her parents desireed to her and had his/her personal attack while taking her personal attack, committed assaulting the victim, such as “Chewing son”, “a son equal to a bit bit of bitch bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260(3) and (1) of the Criminal Act;

B. On December 4, 2017, the victim, after filing a prosecution, expressed his/her intention not to punish him/her;

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow