logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.04.24 2015고단339
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)
Text

Defendant

A and C shall be punished by a fine of 2,500,000 won, and by imprisonment of 10 months, respectively.

Defendant

A and C shall be subject to the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 02:00 on December 24, 2014, the Defendants jointly committed an offense: (a) around 02:00, at the “E-cafeteria” located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) Defendant A, while drinking alcohol, she saw the above restaurant employees to take a bath.

As a result, the victim F, the victim F, and the same G who is the customer, the defendant A gets ear of the victim F, walked the body part of the victim F by walking the body part in several times, the defendant B is able to knee the body part of the victim F, the defendant B is able to knee the body part of the victim F with the kne face, and the defendant C is hne the face of the victim F with the hand floor, and the face of the victim G continuously took place.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim F and G, respectively.

2. Defendant B

A. A. At around 02:20 on December 24, 2014, the Defendant insultingd the victim by referring the victim to “I, a police officer belonging to the Kumi Police Station H District, sent out after receiving 112 a report, to arrest the Defendant as an offender in the act of assault,” among the above restaurant employees J and customers, who were the said restaurant employees J and customers, who were in the said victim.”

B. On December 24, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, around 02:45, and waiting for a police officer in charge of the act of assault to be arrested and investigated in the H district of the original U.S. police station located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, and the police officer in charge of the act of assault in order to be arrested as an offender in the act of assault, and thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to police officer’s service.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement concerning I, L, F, and G;

1. Each written statement of M, F and G;

1. A copy of the work log;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a damaged part of a photograph, or to a photograph by cutting down each CCTV;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 2 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act.

arrow