A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:00 on September 29, 2014, the Defendant, at the main point of “D” located in Suwon-si, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, and 112, who was divinged without paying the drinking value, expressed that the police officer F, who was dispatched after being reported at 112, would pay the drinking value by shouldering the Defendant, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reporting case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (All circumstances including the fact that a police officer who assaultss a police officer who executes public duties is not good in nature, but confessions and reflects the crime, contingency crimes, and the fact that there is no same kind of force);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;