logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2016.03.31 2015고단1487
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in this Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 2, 2015.

1. On November 17, 2014, in a restaurant located in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, Inc., Daegu-gu, the Defendant: (a) the fact is that the Defendant’s mobile phone sales business operated at the time was accumulated with a debt of approximately KRW 4-5 million; and (b) even if the Defendant borrowed money from others, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the money, the Defendant is required to pay the amount of the card to the victim C.

The loan of KRW 3 million is 1.3 million on the same day, and the remaining KRW 1.7 million on the same day shall be repaid by not later than 30,000 on the 30th of this month, and the loan was acquired by deception from the damaged person, i.e., KRW 3 million on the tin.

2. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. On December 2, 2011, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant was “F” and “F” in the joint guarantor name column in the guarantee certificate without authority for the purpose of exercising a loan of KRW 5 million from the savings bank in the name of the E in the name of the lending company, and forged the deposit bank guarantee in the name of F, a private document on the rights and obligations of the lending company, and then sent it to the person in charge of the savings bank loan in the name of F, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of the lending company at around the same time, and subsequently exercised the said guarantee certificate by facsimile, as if it was duly formed.

B. The Defendant committing the crime related to the lending of the exercise of the right to collateral loan, at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, obtains a loan of KRW 5 million in the name of the guarantor E from the hold of the right to collateral loan, which is the lending company, without authority, to exercise the right to collateral loan of KRW 5 million in the name of the joint and several surety name column of the joint and several surety loan contract, “F”, “G” in the resident number column, “G” in the State column, “H,” and “I” in the telephone number column, “I”, and “I” on December 2, 2011 - December 2, 2014 - in the guarantee period column, “O million”, “139%” in the guarantee bond column, “39%” in the guarantee bond column, and “39%” in the overdue interest rate column

arrow