logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.05.26 2017고정225
사문서위조등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, his father B died on November 13, 2016 and was entrusted with the issuance of a certificate of seal imprint, but did not have the fact that his father B received the certificate of seal imprint under B.

1. On November 16, 2016, the Defendant forged private documents: 132, 132, 132, 200, 2000, 2000, 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of proxy for issuance of a certificate of seal imprint in the name of a delegating person B, or agent A, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1, exercised the instant investigation document by delivering the power of attorney to E, who is an employee of the Eup/Myeon Office, who is aware of the forgery as above, as if the document was a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written accusation;

1. A written statement prepared by E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the details of notification of the deceased of a health and welfare father;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. A fine not exceeding 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the grounds of not less than Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., details of a crime, the name and content of a forged document, and the fact that there is no other criminal record, as well as the punishment of a fine once for a crime

arrow