logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.12.08 2015고합518
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(유사성행위)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Sexual assault, 80 hours against the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In February 2014, the Defendant forced the victim F (hereinafter “E”) to have access to the Twitter using a mobile phone at the end of February, 2014, followed the victim F (hereinafter “E”) as if the victim was female in 20 years of age and had an access to the conversation, and divided the conversations between the victim and SM (referring to the Marithm, which causes sexual humiliation and pain by giving pain to the sexual subject), and divided the conversations between the victim and SM (referring to the Marithm, which causes sexual humiliation and pain) through the NA “G”), and then, the victim demanded that the victim send a photo by exposing the body of the body of the body of the body of the victim.” The victim misleads the victim as being female in 13 years of age, and transmitted the victim’s back-to-face exposure photograph to the victim’s body.

After that, the Defendant received the victim’s personal information from the victim, and then divided into the victim and the NAV “G” Messenger’s Messenger’s Messenger, the Defendant threatened the victim to the effect that “if personal information is not known such as house address, telephone number, school name, etc., the transmitted photograph will be put on the Internet.

From the end of February 2014 to the end of March of the same year, the Defendant again received from the victim a down-to-face photo by threatening that “I would post a down-to-face exposure photograph on the school homepage if I would not send the back-to-face without affixing the half-face)” to the victim’s possession of the victim’s upper half-to-face exposure photograph and personal information as above.

In this respect, the defendant threatened the victim to perform an act of non-performance of obligation.

2. Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, violence, and violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Kamera, etc.);

A. The Defendant, at around March 2014, dialogueed with the victim via Twitter, “E”, and as in the preceding paragraph, was the body photograph of the victim.

arrow