Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 6 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 24, 2013, at around 03:50, Defendant A found the victim B (the age of 37) who was a fluorant in D’s private village (the age of 37) while being accompanied by D on January 24, 2013, and took a bath to “hyp two gyp, hyp, hyp, hyp,” and added the face of the victim who was fluored one time, and again, the victim’s chest was tightly 21 days, and the victim’s chests need to receive treatment for about 21 days.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as in the above paragraph, divided the victim A (the age of 37) into assaulting himself, and made it difficult for the victim to use the kitchen 19cm (blade length), which is a dangerous object in the kitchen, and the kitchen click, as “the victim”, and threatened the victim by using the kitchen click, which is a dangerous object in the kitchen click, and the victim’s click door that prevents the victim from facing and entering the kitchen click, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Seizure records;

1. Seized articles and photographs of the upper part of the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury and the choice of a fine);

(b) Defendant B: Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the Criminal Act

1. Discretionary mitigation Defendant B: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of a suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as “contributable circumstances”)

1. Defendant A of the provisional payment order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Although Defendant A had been subject to punishment twice as a violent crime, the fact that the same kind of crime was committed is unfavorable circumstances, or is contrary to the recognition of his mistake, and the fact that Defendant B’s inevitable act against his female living together with the victim is interested and contingent.