logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.29 2016가단5073166
소유권이전등기말소
Text

1. As to the share of 41.44/6 of 273.6 square meters in Gangnam-gu Seoul F. F. 273.6 square meters to E, Defendant B and C.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul, H, I, J, K, and other five parcels of land (hereinafter “A land”) (hereinafter “A”)

(A) Eight sectional owners (hereinafter referred to as “A owners”) who were erected in the area.

(B) 4 parcels, such as the Gangnam-gu Seoul, F, M, N, andO (hereinafter referred to as “B-land”).

(B) 4 owners of detached houses (hereinafter referred to as “B owners”) have been constructed.

In 200, the government decided to remove the P Building A(16 households) and the P Building B(16 households) on the land A, and to reconstruct the P Building B(16 households) on the land B. The owners of A and B reported on May 15, 200 on the commencement of construction on the following grounds: (a) eight owners and one owners of B for Dong building; (b) one of B and 12 owners for Dong building; and (c) one owner for B and 12 owners for building; and (d) the R Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “R Co., Ltd.” for convenience”) operated by Q as the Si construction project; and (b) the government reported on the commencement of construction on April 21, 2001 for building B and August 17, 2001 for building B.

3) Among them, the RB Co., Ltd. purchased their shares from B owners and constructed the B-dong building, and thereafter the 16-generation will transfer ownership in the future to the person designated by the RBA. The 8-generation will acquire their shares from owners and newly construct the A-dong building at the expense of the RBA and own the 8-households, and transfer their ownership in the future to a person designated by the RBA in lieu of the payment of the construction cost. 4) A and B entered into the RB building construction contract with the RB in this case on December 1, 2001, with the RA and the building construction contract in this case. Since the RBA renounced its construction as a matter of tax investigation at that time, the RBA entered into an agreement with the RBA and the construction contract with the RBA, and also entered into a new construction contract on February 19, 200 and the construction right and the construction-related authority of the RBAD.

Accordingly, A, E shall be the same as A, A.

arrow