logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.06.04 2019고단1063
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 1, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 4 million from the Incheon District Court to a fine of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, and on May 23, 2016, a summary order of KRW 4 million from the Seoul Northern District Court to a fine of KRW 1 million for the same crime.

Around 06:30 on March 9, 2019, the Defendant driven CM6 car at approximately 10km from the south-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul, to the 1614 new forest basin to the marc marg in front of Seoul Mapo-gu, Seoul, with the alcohol concentration of 0.241%.

As a result, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

2. On March 9, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) driven a passenger car listed in paragraph (1) with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.241% under the influence of alcohol around March 06, 2019, and driven the front cycle road of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government along the three-lanes in the direction of gender emitting in the direction of emitting a luculation from the surface of the red door tunnel.

In addition, in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, it is difficult to drive a motor vehicle, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by properly manipulating the steering gear and the steering gear for the driver of the motor vehicle, because it is at night and there was a motor vehicle under a stop due to road congestion at the front.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while driving under the influence of alcohol without neglecting it, was driven by the victim D (year 41) who was under the influence of driving in the front room due to negligence without properly operating the operation of the operation system, and was driven by the victim D (year 41). The Defendant was followed by the panion of the above SM6 car.

As a result, the defendant is unable to drive normally due to influence of drinking, and the defendant driving the above SM6 car for about two weeks to the victim.

arrow