logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.08.16 2018구합267
건축물표시변경에대한불허가처분취소
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 31, 2014, the Plaintiff obtained a building permit of 8,650 square meters of a site area, 4,430.04 square meters of a building site, and 5 Dongs of general steel structure (hereinafter “the instant house”) on each land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant site”) from the Defendant, and obtained approval for the use of the said house from the Defendant on June 12, 2015, following the commencement of construction.

However, the instant friendship only completed the basic framework and did not have a facility for raising cattle, and the Plaintiff did not raise cattle in the said friendship.

B. On June 24, 2015, the Plaintiff completed the registration of preservation of ownership in the Plaintiff’s name with respect to the instant friendship. On the register, the details of the building on the register are “1,122 square meters in general steel structure, 1,122 square meters in a single floor, 1,122 square meters in a separate steel structure, 1,122 square meters in a single floor, 1,122 square meters in a general steel structure, 528 square meters in a single floor, 396 square meters in a general steel structure, 131.04 square meters in a manager of a general steel structure, 131.04 square meters in a light steel structure, 24 square meters in a second floor, and 131.04 square meters in a manager of a two-story light steel structure.”

C. On May 16, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a report on the alteration of livestock excreta discharge facilities with the Defendant on May 16, 2017.

On August 2, 2017, the Plaintiff sent a letter to the Defendant, on the ground that he/she completed a report on the change of livestock excreta discharge facilities, and filed an application for change of the content of entry in the management ledger of the building (hereinafter “instant application”) with the Defendant on August 2, 2017, on the ground that he/she completed the report on the change of livestock excreta discharge facilities.

E. On January 25, 2018, the Defendant rendered a non-permission disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the following grounds: (a) on the ground that the instant application was rejected as a result of deliberation by the Civil Petitions Conciliation Committee in Yeongdeungpo-cheon City.

2. With respect to an application for change in the indication of a building on a parcel, 975-3, and 6 parcels, when the application for change of the thickness is made, the following grounds are as follows:

arrow