Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 15, 2017, at around 10:40 on October 15, 2017, Defendants were on meals in the “E restaurant” located in the Geum-gu Busan Metropolitan Government D, and Defendant A’s wife was on the spot upon receipt of a report by F, etc., the 119 first-aid crew members, etc., who lost their consciousness as a branch soldier.

Defendant

A, in the event that the above F et al. withdrawn emergency measures, it refers to the purport that the F et al. refuses to take emergency measures such as measuring the patient's active symptoms, and even if the F et al. refuses to take emergency measures, the F et al. attempted to take emergency measures, such as monitoring the patient's active symptoms, and carried the F's neck by hand, with a hand, sealed the F's eye.

Accordingly, the police officer G belonging to the Busan Geum-gu Police Station, which was called upon a 112 report to the effect that “to interfere with emergency measures,” was put into place, and Defendant B was not the police officer with whom 119 did not go to G;

The police was missing, "I", and the chest of G was tightly pushed about 6 times by hand.

As a result, Defendant A assaulted fire officers to interfere with legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 119 reported cases, and Defendant B assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and G;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for the crime (elective of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Social service order: The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of Defendant B [the scope of recommended punishment] The basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person who is subject to special sentencing) is not a basic area (the person who is subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence] The degree of interference with the performance of official duties is minor;

Although there is no way to recognize and reflect the facts of crime, the defendant A has no power, and the defendant B has many records of violent punishment, and it is other than this.