logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016.5.26. 선고 2016두34295 판결
전원개발실시계획승인처분취소
Cases

2016du34295 Revocation of revocation of approval for an execution plan for electric power resource development

Plaintiff Appellant

It is as shown in the attached list of Plaintiffs.

Defendant Appellee

The Minister of Trade, Industry

Intervenor joining the Defendant

Korea hydroelectric Power Co., Ltd.

The judgment below

Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu61810 Decided January 28, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

May 26, 2016

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Accordingly, all appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing party. It is so decided as per

May 26, 2016

Judges

Justices Park Sang-hoon

Justices Kim Jae-tae

Chief Justice Cho Jae-hee

Justices Park Sang-ok

Attached Form

A person shall be appointed.

arrow