logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.04.29 2015고단1810
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 16, 2015, Defendant A, as an acting driver, was driving a Dob scam scambing truck on May 16, 2015, following the operation of the Dob scam scam drive, Defendant A, along with the course of driving the Dob scam scam, to the police box of the Dog Industrial Complex, from the border of the East East Industrial Complex.

In this case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by checking whether there are other motor vehicles, etc. that reduce the speed prior to the entry into the intersection and cross-raid the front side and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not find the victim B (55 Systasi) driving on the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle and received the front part of the said rocketing taxi as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle without finding out the victim B (55 Systasi) having driven the intersection at the right-hand side of the Defendant’s course.

Defendant 1 suffered injury to the victim B, such as cage cage cages, which requires five weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence as above, and Defendant 2 caused the victim F (53 tax) who was on board the head of the vehicle of Defendant 2 due to the occupational negligence in competition with the victim B, to death by a fage, etc. in light of the same day.

2. On May 16, 2015, Defendant B driven a rocketing taxi around 00:45, and led Defendant B to the passage from the shower distance to the third distance of environmental office on the front of the shooting distance of the foreign exchange bank mentioned in the preceding paragraph.

In this case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by checking whether there are other motor vehicles, etc. that reduce the speed prior to the entry into the intersection and cross-raid the front side and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so.

arrow