logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.11.29 2017고단1364
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 4, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main store business by force of about 20 minutes, such as: (a) around 01:40 on January 4, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime at around 01:0, in the “E amusement shop” operated by the victim D (n, e.g., 50 years old) on the first underground floor; (b) without paying the drinking value, and (c) the Defendant was forced to control the victim; and (d) the Defendant’s main store business by force of about 20 minutes.

2. The crime on April 2, 2017;

A. On April 2, 2017, the Defendant, who assaulted the Victim F, was required to calculate the drinking value to the Victim F (22 years of age) who is an employee in the “H dan” located in G around 04:03 on April 2, 2017.

The term “the victim” refers to “the victim’s timber was bleeped at the time of several times.”

B. The Defendant committed assault against the victim I at the time, place, and place indicated in the family paragraph (a) with the victim I (48 years old) who is a danran bar business owner, was tightly tight twice in the victim’s neck, and the left knife in one time in the left knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. A statement of damage to D and a F statement;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and community service order;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines for the crimes of Category 1 (Assaults) and Category 2 (Assaults) in the basic sphere (Assaults) of Category 1 (Assaults between February and October) (Assaults) (Crime 2 (Assaults) in the basic sphere) (Crime 1 to October) in the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines for the crimes of Category 3 (Obstruction of Duties) in the basic sphere (Interference with Duties). The scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of the mitigated scope of crimes of Category 1 (Interference with Duties) in the mitigated area (Crime 1 to 8 months): February 20 to May 20;

2. To compensate the victim of a crime of obstruction of business by the defendant in the decision of sentence, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and to assault each crime of violence;

arrow