1. As to real estate listed in Schedule 1 attached hereto to C:

A. Defendant A is the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Southern District Court’s Yeongdeungpo-gu registry office on 1998.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the creditor of the network D, and as the network D died, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit of claim for reimbursement against D, which is the child of D, on January 6, 2012, the Incheon District Court 2012Gadan1619, and C filed a report of inheritance recognition with the Seoul Family Court 2012Ra2625, and the said report was accepted on June 29, 2012.

B. From the date of mediation of the case No. 2012Gao1919 of the Incheon District Court on July 20, 2012, the Plaintiff and C paid the Plaintiff 124,517,305 won within the scope of property inherited to the Plaintiff from the network D and 34,012,049 won among them, from May 21, 2010 to the date of complete payment, and from May 21, 2010 to the date of full payment, 22,935,382 won, and 5,436,875 won among them, the amount of money calculated by the rate of 19% per annum from May 13, 2010 to the date of full payment.”

(c) C is subject to inheritance from the network D of real estate listed in the Schedule 2, 3, but is inherited by inheritance of more than 180,000 won in excess of that value, and C is insolvent within the scope of the property inherited from the network D.

On the other hand, the network D's order 1-A concerning the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter "the real estate of this case") against Defendant A, his wife, for sale as of May 25, 1998.

Defendant A completed the registration of ownership transfer as indicated in paragraph (1), and Defendant B was the wife of his own speech and network D with respect to the instant real estate, which was due to the sale on March 3, 2003, 1-B.

The registration of ownership transfer was completed.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. Disposition 1 on the real estate of this case alleged by the plaintiff

b. The registration described in paragraph D and the defendant A is subject to 1-b.

The registration of the statement in the port is a registration of invalidity caused by false conspiracy between the defendant A and the defendant B. The plaintiff, the creditor of C, in subrogation of the defendants within the scope of the property inherited from the network D.