beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 50,842,092 as well as the annual rate from February 10, 2010 to June 3, 2015 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The Plaintiff, at around 13:40 on February 10, 2010, operated a e-maild car at the intersection of the private road in front of the Gwangju Guro-gu, Gwangju, and suffered bodily injury, such as the e-scoo vehicle, and the e-scoo vehicle, followed by the e-scoo vehicle in the atmosphere of the left-hand signal, and then the e-scoo vehicle was shocked to the e-sood part, and then the e-sood part was shocked
(2) The Defendant is an insurer that entered into a comprehensive insurance contract for the said Ecuas car.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, Eul evidence 4 and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. The Defendant, the insurer, is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by the instant accident.
2. In addition to the separate statements under the calculation of the amount of damages, it shall be calculated at present in accordance with the calculation method of the amount of damages as shown in the separate sheet of calculation of the amount of damages (the interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month shall be calculated at the rate of simple interest, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis in principle, but the less than a month shall be included on the side in which the amount is less than a month and less than the original and the less than the last month shall be included), and it shall be rejected that the parties’
(1) On March 3, 2001, the Plaintiff asserted that the income of the “other simple employees related to services” and the “persons engaged in public health, social welfare and religion-related work” of the Ministry of Employment and Labor should be the total amount of each income of the “report on the actual status of work by type of employment” and the “persons engaged in public health, social welfare and religion-related work” of the “report on the actual status of work by type of employment” in the Ministry of Employment and Labor until the date of age of 60, and that the said report should be calculated as the income of the “persons engaged in public health, social welfare and religion-related work.”
(2) First, at the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff is “persons engaged in public health, social welfare, and religion-related work” in the “report on the actual status of work by employment type.”