beta
Text
Defendant
A and B Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months, for each of the defendants C and G, for one year and six months, for each of the defendants D, E, and F.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] Defendant A was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on May 1, 2012, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on May 17, 2012. Defendant C was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul East Eastern District Court on November 12, 2010 and the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 20, 2010. Defendant D was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for six months at the Seoul East East Eastern District Court on November 12, 2010 and the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 20, 2010. Defendant G was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution from the Chungcheong District Court on February 22, 201 to ten years of imprisonment for fraud.
[Attachment] Defendant B loaned 150 million won from May 2007 to March 2008 to Defendant A, a former representative director of M, through Defendant A and Defendant C, a former real estate company, a planning real estate company, to which Defendant B had worked as the youth of M (hereinafter “M”), and registered Defendant A as the representative director. Defendant B was transferred M on May 27, 2008 and operated Defendant A as the transferee of M on May 27, 2008.
Defendant C, the managing director, Defendant C, and Defendant D, the managing director of the company, have increased the debt amount of the company, and even in the name of Defendant B and other persons, they could use and resolve only a few months, and introduce Defendant G. Defendant B and A, without the O’s consent, intended to obtain money by providing Seongbuk-gu P, Seoul, Qu Building 201 Dong 702 (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) located in P, Qgu, Seoul (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”).
【Criminal Facts】
1. Defendant A, B, C, D, and G’s joint crimes were committed due to the shortage of company operation funds, and Defendant B and A demanded the provision of security by borrowing money from Defendant G, the corporate bondholder, upon introduction of Defendant G, which was known through Defendant C and D.