A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. In the case where the victim D refuses to refund the bread value on August 10, 2015, while the Defendant demanded a refund at the “C” coffee shop located in Sungnam-si, Manam-si, Mannam-si, Manam-si, Manam-si, Man-si, Man-si, the Defendant: (a) was unable to equally engage in funeral services for the victim on the ground that the victim D refused to refund the bread value;

썅 년 아 ”라고 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

2. On August 10, 2015, from around 10:30 to around 10:45 minutes of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the instant victim D's coffee business by force, such as: (a) demanding a refund of the said coffee shop; and (b) taking the brecing of the brecing brecing to the floor, such as taking the brecing of the brecing brecing of the brecing of the brecing, and taking the body of the Defendant on the floor.

3. On August 10, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at around 10:45, when he received a 112 report before the coffee shop and received a request for an identification card from a slopeF belonging to the Sungnam-nam Police Station Ear-gu, Sungnam Police Station, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) no identification card exists; (b) going away from the site; and (c) leaving the site with the right hand floor of the police officer twice.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

4. On August 12:02, 2015, the Defendant damaged public goods, while being arrested and being investigated as a current offender of insult and interference with duties at the Sungnam Police Station E District of the Sungnam Police Station E-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, would promptly remove “the head protection unit for the victim’s own use” on the market price, and would impair the utility of public goods used by public offices by removing “the head protection unit for the victim’s own use” on the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact of insult and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor) concerning criminal facts (the point of interference with business and the punishment by imprisonment);