logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.10.18 2019고정1117
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3.5 million, by a fine of KRW 2.0 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,00.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the representative director of “D”, Defendant A is the head of “D” team, and Defendant C is the article of “D”.

At around 22:10 on January 12, 2019, the Defendants stated to the Defendants that “F cafeteria in the E” front of the “F cafeteria,” the G Company’s site captain H (31 years of age), “Name-B is the customer of the insurance company where the victim works, and towing the vehicle for the operation of the above name in the towing vehicle connected with the insurance company, the Defendants used the towing vehicle to tow the vehicle for the operation of the above name-free box, and Defendant A, by hand, her hand, her blick at one time, her face and back the victim’s face and back with the flick.” Defendant B continued to display the victim’s face once a week, and Defendant C’s head is considered as the victim’s hand, and she considered the victim’s head as the victim’s hand.

As a result, the defendants jointly put up the victim about about 14 days of treatment, such as the impairment of character and strawing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement of H;

1. Each police statement made to I, J, K, L, M, and N;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs of damage (defendants);

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the Defendants’ mistake, and considering favorable circumstances that the Defendants agreed smoothly with the victims after the prosecution was instituted. The records and arguments of this case, such as the Defendants’ criminal history, form of action, degree of participation, and other Defendants’ age, character and conduct, career, environment, background and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, are revealed.

arrow