Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,500,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:04 on October 20, 2013, Defendant A made a statement that the basic taxi rate and the premium were increased in entirety to the victim B, a guest boarding the E-cab in the operation of Defendant A, prior to the information center of the Supreme Court of Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-gu, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, by hearing the phrase “I cannot hear the voice that I would know that I would have known that I would have known that I would have a premium. I would accurately explain. I would like to say that I would like to hear the victim’s fat, with the victim’s fat face facing the victim’s drinking, and fatd about 10 times, and caused the victim’s injury, such as the victim’s entrance and the surrounding heat.

2. Defendant B, at the above date and time, became a vision for the foregoing reasons, and the victim’s right eyes are hye one time in drinking, and the victim’s hye and the victim’s hye and the victim’s hye and hye were hye, and the victim’s hye and the victim’s hye and hye were gye, and the victim’s hye

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement (the defendant A)

1. The defendant B's partial statement (the defendant B)

1. The witness B’s legal statement (as to the defendant A)

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Defendants’ written statements

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order asserts that the Defendants’ act constitutes legitimate act that does not contravene self-defense or social norms in order to defend their body.

In light of the above evidence, the Defendants committed the above acts with the intent of attacking and damaging each other.