beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 31,947,804; (b) KRW 1,250,600 for each of the said money to Plaintiff A; and (c) from April 14, 2015 to September 20, 2017 for each of the said money.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. At around 23:00 on April 14, 2015, Nonparty C driven D passenger cars, and proceeded to the direction of luminous terminal as Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, in the direction of the upper half of Gwangju. Nonparty C stopped only after the access road to which he/she is a virtue human body. Nonparty E is a F Truck that he/she has driven (hereinafter referred to as “F Truck”).
(2) The traffic accident in this case is the traffic accident in this case, hereinafter referred to as the “traffic accident”).
2) Plaintiff A was on board the said van, but the instant traffic accident caused injury to Plaintiff A, i.e., the 2nd troke, the 4-5th verteculma, the 4-5th verteculma, the 6th verteculma, the upper left-hand pelle, the upper right pelle, the upper right pelle, and the blood transfusion, etc. due to the instant traffic accident.
3) Plaintiff B is Plaintiff A’s A’s children, and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement for the instant sea vehicle with respect to which the instant sea vehicle was located. [Grounds for recognition] of absence of dispute, evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including paper numbers, the purport of the entire pleadings)
B. Under Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (Liability) and Articles 724 and 726-2 of the Commercial Act, the Defendant is liable to compensate for all damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident.
C. As to the Defendant’s assertion on limitation of liability, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant should limit the Defendant’s liability by taking into account the fault of the victim, as the Plaintiff A did not wear a safety level, she was seated in Nonparty C’s vehicle, and the driver of the instant accident was C.
There is no evidence to prove that the plaintiff A did not wear a safety level, and it is limited to the vehicle that the plaintiff A was driven by the pastor C as a church performer, and it is proved that the plaintiff A provided a cause for the accident.