beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 861,792,531; and (b) KRW 10,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) KRW 2,00,000 to Plaintiff C and each of the said money.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. On April 22, 2016, Plaintiff A driven D cab on April 2, 2016, and entered the front distance of “F” located in Gwangju Mine E using two lanes among four-lane roads. Nonparty G driving H truck and changed the two-lanes into the front direction of “F” located in Gwangju Mine E by using one lane behind Plaintiff A. Nonparty G changed the two-lanes, and the front direction of the said truck was received as part of the front direction right part of the said truck. 2) The front part of the child-care center vehicle operated by Plaintiff A was pushed down along the front direction of the said taxi and the front side part of the said taxi.
(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case". 3) The plaintiff A suffered from injury to the plaintiff A, such as cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Spa.
The defendant is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a mutual aid agreement on H truck vehicle operated by G, which is the perpetrator of the above traffic accident.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1-8 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings
B. Under Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (Liability) and Articles 724 and 726-2 of the Commercial Act, the Defendant is liable to compensate for all damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident.
C. The defendant's assertion that the defendant should limit the defendant's liability on the ground that the damage caused by the accident in this case was increased due to the plaintiff Gap's failure to wear the safety level at the time of the accident in this case, but it is not sufficient to recognize the defendant's liability on the basis of each statement in the evidence No. 4 through No. 7.
2. A period for calculating the scope of compensation for damage shall be calculated on a monthly basis in principle, but it shall be less than the last month.