1. The Defendant: 4,834,080 won to Plaintiff A; 2,833,530 won to Plaintiff B; 5,193,050 won to Plaintiff C; and 2,001 to Plaintiff D.

Facts of recognition

The name and public notice of project approval - The E-Road Construction Works - the public notice of project implementation authorization: The Gangnam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City public noticeF ( April 18, 2016) and G ( July 24, 2017): The project implementer: The adjudication of expropriation on September 26, 2017 by the National Land Tribunal of the defendant Incheon Metropolitan City: The adjudication of expropriation was made on all the obstacles on the surface of each land on each land listed in the column for "land subject to expropriation" listed in the attached Table owned by the plaintiffs, but the plaintiffs did not file an application for an appraisal of the amount of compensation, and thus, the land is examined only below.

(E) - Compensation for losses as land located in the Michuhol-gu Incheon Hadong and its lot number is specified only): The amount corresponding to each item in the "compensation for expropriation" column in the attached Table - The date of expropriation commencement: The Central Land Expropriation Committee's ruling on June 21, 2018 (hereinafter "the ruling of this case"): The amount corresponding to each item in the "compensation for losses" column in the attached Table : The court's appraisal of the corresponding amount as stated in the "Compensation for losses" column in the attached Table : The amount in the "Compensation for losses" column in the attached Table - the facts that there is no dispute about each item in the "Compensation for losses" column in the "Court's appraisal result" column in the attached Table 1 through 4, Eul (including the number of branches), the result of the appraisal entrustment to appraisal corporation I, the purport of the entire pleadings, and the compensation set in the ruling of this case's assertion by the plaintiffs shall not extend to the reasonable compensation for the land owned by the plaintiffs. The defendant is obligated to pay the difference between the reasonable compensation for the land subject to be paid to the plaintiffs and the late date of expropriation.

Judgment

In a lawsuit concerning the increase or decrease of land expropriation compensation, each appraisal that forms the basis for the ruling and each appraisal by the court and each appraisal by the court are in the assessment methods.