1. The Defendant: (a) to Plaintiff A, KRW 24,806,150,740, Plaintiff B, C, and D, respectively, and each of them on July 12, 2017.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - E private investment facilities project - Approval and public notice of project implementation plans: The defendant;

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on May 18, 2017 - Land subject to expropriation: Each relevant land indicated in the column for “to be expropriated” in the attached Table owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “instant G land” and “the area of 1,346 square meters of G G land in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, and H 1,346 square meters of H land” in the instant H land - Compensation for losses: Each relevant amount indicated in the column for “compensation for expropriation” in the attached Table - The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on July 11, 2017 - An I and J Co., Ltd.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on objection (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) dated December 21, 2017 - Compensation for losses: Each of the relevant amounts stated in the column for “compensation for losses” in the attached Table 1: K stock company and L [based on recognition]: The fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s 1, 2, 3 evidence, Eul’s 1, 2, 3 evidence, and 1, 2, and 3 evidence (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the entire pleadings, as a whole.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiffs' compensation for the objection of this case is not less than a legitimate compensation for each of the instant lands owned by the plaintiffs, and in particular, the compensation for the difference between the compensation for the objection and the compensation for the delay from the date following the date of expropriation shall be paid to the plaintiffs, as the result of the court's entrustment of appraisal and the result of the supplemental appraisal (hereinafter "the result of the court's appraisal and the court's supplementary appraisal") with respect to each of the instant H land, although it is necessary to evaluate the land No. 110.7 square meters (No. 1 and 2 in the table of the result of the photo appraisal in 1966 below, hereinafter "the instant land in question") among the instant H land as a "forest" according to the actual situation of use.