logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.26 2018나3686
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment in the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate even if the submitted evidence is examined

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal as follows, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

In the second instance judgment of the first instance court, the second instance judgment "a conflict, and as a result, D died," "(hereinafter "the accident of this case")," and "D died," respectively.

The third part of the judgment of the first instance was "," and the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance was "," and the second part "former parent" was "the parent," respectively.

The fifth and sixth conduct of the first instance judgment "No. 20-1 through 3, 21, 22, and 25-1 of the evidence No. 20-20 of the first instance judgment" is "No. 20-1 through 3, A, 21, 22, and 25-1 of the evidence No. 20-20 of the first instance judgment," and the second and sixth conduct "the judgment of this case" is respectively dismissed as "the first instance judgment."

The first instance court's "No. 16" in the seventh instance judgment shall be deemed to be "No. 16,17 evidence".

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow