logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.06.13 2016구단1360
국가유공자 및 보훈보상대상자 등록거부처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On Aug. 7, 1969, the Plaintiff entered the Army and served as a small gun at the 65 Team of the 21st Team of the 21st Team of the 21st Team of the 1969, and was dispatched to the Vietnam War from February 11, 1971 to January 28, 1972, and was discharged from military service on July 7, 1972.

B. On around 2006 and around 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant to the State, alleging that he was injured during the Vietnam War, but did not meet the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State.

C. On September 16, 2015, the Plaintiff again filed an application for re-registration of persons of distinguished service to the State with the difference between the Defendant and the Defendant, stating that “Woo-man had taken large trees while cleaning the GOP region while serving in the 21st GOP group 54 consecutive service, caused an accident involving head and ear, and that the disease occurred due to the total number of soldiers in Vietnam War and ear, etc.” (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

Accordingly, on January 26, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition of this case to the Plaintiff on the ground that there is no objective evidence to acknowledge that the instant wounds occurred due to the performance of official duties in the military after deliberation by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement.

E) The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal following the filing of an objection, but was dismissed on November 1, 2016. [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap’s 1, 2, and Eul’s 1 through 5, the purport of the entire pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff, while cleaning the GOP accounting system during the 21st group 65 joint service, was cut down, was sent back according to the joint and several obligation due to the occurrence of the head and ear, and was hospitalized for 45 days after being hospitalized in the Vietnam War for a severe period of after being hospitalized for 45 days, and repeated daily due to repeated exposure to the total and sporessing voice during the Vietnam War. The instant disposition that was otherwise determined on the ground that there was no objective data.

arrow