1. The Defendants: (a) each of the Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. paid KRW 17,807,640 to the day of full payment from May 17, 2019.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 20, 2014, Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) obtained a building permit for two-story neighborhood living facilities buildings (a building area of 768.12 square meters) on the ground E in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si.

B. On February 9, 2015, Plaintiff Company contracted the construction of the said building (hereinafter “instant construction”) to FF Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) by setting the construction cost of KRW 770 million from February 23, 2015 to June 30, 2015, and extended the construction period on September 30, 2015.

C. Defendant C, who operated the “G golf range” in the vicinity of the instant construction site, and Defendant D, the head of H village where the instant construction work was conducted and the head of H-dong passbook, conspired to prevent the instant construction work, and committed the following acts of interference with construction between July 3, 2015 and September 2015. As to this, in each general traffic obstruction and interference with business, each of the instant general traffic obstruction and interference with business was prosecuted, and the Cheongju District Court was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2,00,000 on September 1, 2017, and became final and conclusive around that time.

1) From July 3, 2015 to September 2015, the Defendants: (a) installed a steel pole on both sides of the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and the roads between the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, by installing a height restriction facility at a height of about three meters above, and prevented the Defendants from entering the construction site of the instant construction site; (b) from July 5, 2015 to September 5, 2015, the Defendants installed a steel pole on each of the land of Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and installed a steel pole on each of the land of Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, with a width of about four meters; and (c) installed a height restriction facility at a height of about three meters; and (d) obstructed the entry of the Plaintiff Company into the construction site of the instant construction site.

3) On July 17, 2015, the height restriction facilities, such as paragraph (1) of the same Article, are temporarily removed, and FF’s access defects are intended to enter the vehicle, Defendant D is one ton truck, Defendant C is the construction site of the instant ready-mixed vehicle by blocking the front of the ready-mixed vehicle with benz.