logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013.12.12. 선고 2012두17636 판결
고용보험지원금지급제한및반환처분등취소
Cases

2012Du17636. Revocation of restrictions on the payment of employment insurance subsidies and disposition for return, etc.

Plaintiff, Appellee

Export-Import Bank

Defendant Appellant

The Head of Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Office Seoul Southern Site

The judgment below

Seoul High Court Decision 2011Nu45490 Decided July 12, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

December 12, 2013

Text

The part of the judgment of the court below against the defendant is reversed, and the judgment of the court of first instance as to this part is revoked, and this part of the lawsuit

All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

Reasons

Judgment ex officio is made.

According to the records, the Defendant is recognized as having revoked ex officio the disposition on April 29, 201, falling under the part against the Defendant of the lower judgment among the instant disposition on October 11, 201, which was subsequent to the filing of the instant appeal, and on April 29, 201, the payment restriction period for the employment insurance and the payment restriction period for the workplace skill development training expenses, and on July 11, 201, the workplace skill development training site payment disposition for the business owner on July 11, 201. Thus, the Plaintiff’s lawsuit seeking revocation of the

Therefore, the part of the judgment of the court below against the defendant is reversed, and this case is sufficient for the court to directly render a judgment. For the above reasons, the judgment of the court of first instance on this part is revoked, and this part of the lawsuit is dismissed, and the total cost of the lawsuit is borne by the defendant. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating

Judges

Supreme Court Decision 200

Chief Justice Yang Chang-soo

Justices Park Byung-hee

Justices Kim Jae-tae

arrow