A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On March 24, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for habitual fraud at the Daegu District Court on the grounds of habitual fraud, and completed the execution of the sentence in the first intersection of the North Korean Dos on December 26, 2017.

1. On March 12, 2018, the Defendant ordered food and alcohol at the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and received food and alcohol equivalent to a total of 35,000 won of the market price, including 300g and 2 sick, from the injured party, even though he/she was unable to pay the price at the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D.

2. On March 14, 2018, the Defendant ordered food and alcohol to pay the price at the “H” restaurant where employees G working in Daegu Suwon-gu F, Daegu-gu, was unable to do so. However, the Defendant received food and alcohol equivalent to the total market value of KRW 14,00,00 in total, including one person portion of the same sugar and one bottle, from G.

3. On March 15, 2018, the Defendant ordered an employee I to provide food and drink in the same restaurant as that prescribed in paragraph (2) on March 15, 2018. However, the Defendant received food and beverage in an amount equivalent to 15,00 won in total, including one person of the same sugar and one bottle, from I. The Defendant received food and beverage from I.

4. On March 15, 2018, the Defendant ordered food and alcohol at a “L” restaurant operated by employees K in the Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, where he/she had no capacity to pay the price. However, he/she received food and alcohol equivalent to 18,500 won in total at the market price, including 1 person of the bones of the bones, 200, 300, 300 won, from K.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings victims habitually and acquired the property amounting to 82,500 won in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to K and G;

1. A written statement I and D;

1. Text description and receipt;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiries about criminal history and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (verification of the fact of releasing a repeated offender related thereto);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 351 and 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes.