logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.04.28 2014고정398
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 17:05 on August 18, 2013, the Defendant used a driver’s license for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (free license) from a section of about 300 meters to a road front of the Dong-dong Park on the road where a driver’s license for a driver’s license for a driver’s license for a motor vehicle was not issued.

2. The Defendant, at the same time as in the preceding paragraph, driven the above obbbb in a section of about 200 meters from the front of the waterside park in Busan, which is under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.214% at the same time as in the preceding paragraph to the front of the same new wall.

3. The Defendant, who violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, operated the said urine, which was not covered by mandatory insurance from January 16, 2013 to the 18th day of the same month.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing Defendant Driving Vehicles

1. Relevant provisions of subparagraph 2 of Article 154 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 148-2 (2) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 46 (2) and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do139, Apr. 1

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow