The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant: (a) around 19:00 on April 21, 2013, the facts charged in the instant case: (b) 19:00, on the ground that, in the case of a dispute, the victim, who was aware of the victim of the victim’s dementia in Songpa-gu Seoul, expressed his or her desire to do so without any justifiable reason, he or she pushed the F in his or her hand, pushed up the f, breath, breathed the breath’s breath, and breathed the breath’s breath; and (c) breath’s breath, e.g., the breath’s bat.

As a result, the Defendant added the following parts of the arms that need to be treated for about 14 days to E, and added F to F the salt, tension, etc. of other fingers.

2. The Defendant’s assertion of defense counsel was unilaterally assaulted by E or F, and there was no assault by E or F.

E/F’s act is self-defense as an act against an unlawful attack even if the body of the Defendant was different from the Defendant during the fighting process.

3. Determination

A. 1 There is each of the statements E and F as major evidence to support the Defendant’s assaulting E and F, which meet the constituent elements, and the credibility thereof is examined.

E in this Court, in this Court, the Defendant first expressed that he flabed his flab and flabed his flab, and flabed the Defendant’s flab by setting the Defendant’s flab and flabed the Defendant’s flab. F first stated that the Defendant flabed and flabed the Defendant’s flab and flabed the Defendant’s flab and flabed the Defendant’s flab and flabed the Defendant’s flab and flabed the Defendant’s flab, and flabed the Defendant’s flab and flabed the Defendant’s flab, and the Defendant’s flab

However, the CCTV images taken on the site at the time, while the defendant reported and calculated the head of the Gu, he fights with E, F and horse fighting in front of the calculation team.