logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.07.24 2014구합11441
보상금증액등
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,620,420 as well as 5% per annum from October 12, 2013 to July 24, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public announcement - Project name: B urban environment rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as the “project in this case”) - Public announcement of project area: Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 151,745 square meters - Public announcement of November 8, 2003 (Seoul Metropolitan Government D; hereinafter referred to as the “public announcement in this case”): Public announcement on July 24, 2009 (authorization for project implementation) and on September 24, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as the “public announcement of project implementation”): Defendant

B. The instant expropriation ruling - the expropriation ruling made on August 23, 2013 - the date of expropriation on October 11, 2013: The object subject to expropriation transfer: ① Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Land Expropriation Group 47.3§³, ② the housing of 1st floor block 47.9 square meters, ③ the housing of 1.16 meters in width, and the vertical length of 1.8 meters in order (hereinafter “the instant land, housing, gate,” collectively “the instant housing and gate” among them are “the instant obstacles”) - the amount of compensation calculated as indicated below on the basis of the arithmetic average of the appraisal results of appraisal by the appraisal corporation (e.g., Eg., the Egyna).

C. The instant objection - The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on the objection - Based on the arithmetic mean of the appraisal results of an appraisal corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “appraisals on objection”) on May 22, 2014 - The amount of compensation as indicated in the table below:

D. As a result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal of the land of this case to appraiser H by the court’s appraisal, the appraisal of the obstacles of this case was also entrusted, but the above obstacles were destroyed and thus the appraisal was not conducted. The same is as indicated below in the “court appraisal amount” column.

(The above appraiser shall be referred to as "court appraiser", and together with each appraiser of the instant case, shall be referred to as "each appraiser of the instant case," and each appraiser of the instant case shall be referred to as "each appraisal of the instant case," in total (unit: 1).

arrow