1. The defendant shall be 59,940,070 won to the plaintiff A, 7,765,50 won to the plaintiff B, and 8,506,400 won to the plaintiff C and each of the above amounts.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Business name: D urban environment rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): The public notice of Yeongdeungpo-gu on February 17, 201 - The business area publicly notified by Yeongdeungpo-gu on February 17, 201 - The business area: Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F large-scale 58,564.9㎡ (hereinafter referred to as “the land located in the above G shall be specified only by the lot number

B. The instant adjudication on expropriation - the adjudication on expropriation made on November 22, 2013 by a local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City - the date of commencement of expropriation: June 14, 2013 - the object of expropriation owned by the Plaintiffs

1. The “subject matter of expropriation” as indicated in the “subject matter of expropriation” as indicated in the “subject matter of expropriation” [this case’s expropriation ruling contains the subject matter of transfer, but the subject matter is dissatisfied with only a part of the subject matter of expropriation, the subject matter is entitled to institute an administrative litigation by asserting the grounds for objection (see Supreme Court Decision 2014Du1451, Nov. 13, 2014; Supreme Court Decision 2014Du1451, Nov. 13, 2014; Supreme Court

In this section, each land subject to the above expropriation shall be referred to as "each land of this case" in total, and when part of the land is referred to, the attached Form

1. The phrase “land 1 to 5” by the sequences in the table;

[] - An appraisal corporation (prestigious, third, and hereinafter collectively referred to as "appraisal for expropriation ruling").

on the basis of the arithmetic mean of each appraisal result of each appraisal;

1. Calculation of compensation as stated in the column for expropriation compensation;

C. The instant objection - The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on July 17, 2014 - Based on the arithmetic mean of each appraisal result of an appraisal corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as a “appraisal for an objection,” collectively referred to as a “appraisal for an adjudication,” together with an appraisal of an expropriation ruling; hereinafter collectively referred to as the “appraisal for an adjudication”); and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “assessment result of an appraisal of an expropriation ruling and the appraisal result of an objection,” attached Form against the Plaintiffs

1. The Plaintiff C’s compensation calculated, as stated in the “Objection Compensation” column, has increased only the amount of compensation, as stated in the table.