A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Bknife car.

1. On August 28, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (measures after Accidents) driving the said car around 10:06, and driving the said car on the south-ro in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government along the south-ro 1372 road in Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, along the three-lanes of the telephone station in the Gu from the IIC bank to the long-distance flood area in the city.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle in a prior traffic situation.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while neglecting it and changing the line to four lanes, failed to take necessary measures such as providing relief to the injured party by immediately stopping the vehicle so that the part prior to the left-hand side of the Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop is received by the Defendant as the front part of the right-hand side of the Defendant Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop., which was driven along four lanes.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) driven the said car around October and 20 on August 28, 2017 and driven the front road in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City along the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the width of the valley.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle in a prior traffic situation.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was a victim F (F) who was standing in the signal atmosphere at three-lanes due to negligence when the Defendant neglected to stop in the front of the vehicle at the front of the Defendant’s passenger car, and the lower part of the G bargaining vehicle was driven by the Defendant F (F, who is aged 33).

As a result, the defendant is driving normally under the influence of drinking.