beta
Text
1. The defendant,
A. The Plaintiff KRW 48,036,713 as well as the annual rate from February 7, 2012 to January 21, 2016, and the following.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The defendant company is a company that conducts interior building business and partitions manufacturing business, and the plaintiff is a person who joined the defendant company on February 7, 201 and worked for the defendant company on February 7, 2011.
At around 19:20 on February 7, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) while working in Defendant Company C’s factory located in Pakistan, the board angle was laid in the press box; (b) while putting the press box into a dangerous point where the press box was broken down without turning all of the press presses, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as cutting the right side to the right side and pressing pressure on the press box, while leaving the press presses in order to remove it.
Under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, the Plaintiff was paid KRW 14,272,850 for temporary layoff benefits, KRW 10,915,90 for medical care benefits, and KRW 23,513,890 for disability benefits pursuant to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and received KRW 6,56,300 for disability benefits from an independent party intervenor on November 23, 2012.
[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff did not have any dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the entire pleadings, the occurrence of liability for damages, and the limitation of liability, and the summary of the parties' claim that liability for damages occurred. The plaintiff asserted that the accident of this case occurred because the plaintiff did not have any electronic safety device installed or was installed at the press outlet during which the accident of this case occurred, and that the accident of this case was put into press press work without receiving proper safety education on the method of operating press presses.
In regard to this, the Defendant Company is equipped with an electronic safety device where the operation of the press box is suspended within the scope of the device by attaching a consensus on the front left and right side of the press box in which the instant accident occurred. In this case, the Defendant Company does not work for the press box by taking place the position of put put in place, and the Plaintiff presses the press box.