1. The disposition that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on June 3, 2016 as bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 12, 200, the Plaintiff’s husband’s (hereinafter “the deceased”) entered the original main branch of the C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant branch”) (hereinafter “instant branch”) and performed sales, outstanding amount, and customer management affairs, etc. after visiting customers with respect to various drinking businesses produced by the instant company.

B. The Deceased worked in the instant company on May 29, 2014, but did not work in the instant company on May 30, 2014. On June 2, 2015, around 15:15, the Deceased was found to have committed suicide after having himself/herself avoided in the passenger car at the adjacent vacant site located in the construction site of the non-permanent apartment located in the Hanju-si, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

C. On October 12, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that the deceased’s death constitutes an occupational accident, and filed a claim for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses. However, on June 3, 2016, the Defendant issued a disposition of the bereaved family’s benefits and funeral funeral expenses in accordance with the results of deliberation by the Seoul Committee on Determination of the Occupational Disease, which stated, “The Defendant, on June 3, 2016, issued a disposition of the bereaved family’s benefits and funeral funeral expenses in accordance with the result of deliberation by the Seoul Committee on Determination of the Occupational Disease that “The business relationship is low because the deceased’s death was committed with stress due to the company’s business type, but in practice, it appears that the deceased was able to adapt to certain degree and that his/her mental

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

Although the Plaintiff filed a request for examination against the instant disposition with the Defendant, the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for examination on September 2016. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination against the instant disposition with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but the said Committee rejected the Plaintiff’s request for reexamination on November 25, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 8, 10, 11, 14, 17, Eul evidence 1, and all pleadings.