logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.05.30 2017고단3067
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 18:14, 2017, at the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yangcheon-gu, the Defendant appeared to have paid the taxi fee properly despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee even after using the taxi; and (b) had the said victim get aboard the said taxi while driving the said taxi and let the said taxi to go to the New Village of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul; and (c) had the said victim obtain the pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 8,600 of the taxi fee.

On March 25, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 23:17, 2019, the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Seoul Mapo-gu”); (b) was on a cab operated by the victim D as if he did not have a cash or a settlement card and did not pay a taxi fee; and (c) was on a cab operated by the victim D as he did not have an intent or ability to pay a taxi fee; and (d) was on a 23:35 day of the same day by failing to pay a 6,500 won of the taxi fee even when she arrived at a f,500 won or less of the taxi fee.

around 21:00 on March 29, 2019, the Defendant stated to the effect that “H” in the main point of “H” operated by the victim G in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, the fact was that the Defendant did not possess cash or settlement cards, etc. and did not have an intent or ability to pay the food and service cost, and that the Defendant would bring the victim with only one share of each share of each share of each share, as if he would pay the price.”

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained property or property benefits equivalent to the total market value of KRW 360,000,000 from each of the two weeks 1 and the market value of KRW 130,000 from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 3067"

1. The defendant's statement in court (the second trial date);

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. B written statements;

1. The taxi expense receipt "2019 high-class 1159".

arrow