logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.10.25 2017고단1476
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 21, 2016, the Defendant forged the lease contract under the name of D E on July 8, 2011 and submitted it as evidence for civil procedure in the Busan District Court 303, the Busan District Court 20 Do-ro 112, Busan High Court Do-ro 112, Busan High Court Do-ro, Busan High Court 20, the Busan High Court 303.

“In fact, the lower court, which was prosecuted on the ground of the facts, appeared as a witness of the instant case, such as the fabrication of private documents against D No. 2564, supra.

On July 8, 2011, the Defendant had perused the self-lease agreement, which was presented by D’s defense counsel, and it is essential that the Defendant “A witness made the instant lease agreement (the instant lease agreement on July 8, 201).”

The statement "..." on the examination of the defense counsel "....", and the continuous process of finding the family lease agreement of this case (the above self-lease agreement of July 8, 201) by the witness is required.

As to the examination of the defense counsel ", in writing, the office was located in the underground parking lot, and the construction work (referring to the construction work performed from November 201 to February 201) is viewed as dust and its so, there are several kinds of destruction of the contract and some kinds during the process of arranging documents in which documents and equipment, chairs, computers, etc. will be moved.

“The statement was made”.

However, the above lease agreement of July 8, 201 was prepared by forging the name of E in order for D to file a civil lawsuit against F on September 8, 2013 and submit it as evidence, and the defendant discovered it.

The statement did not exist between November 201 and February 2012.

In addition, the defendant was unable to accurately memory whether or not the above lease contract was actually seen on July 8, 2011 at that time.

Nevertheless, on July 8, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement against memory as he/she directly discovered the lease agreement at that time, and presented perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow