1. The plaintiff's action against the defendant F shall be dismissed.

2. H sand I gas station located in G on December 24, 2013 at Won-si around 12:50.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the driver of the Jindo vehicle owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant B is the driver of the K Indondon vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant”).

B. At around 12:50 on December 24, 2013, Defendant B discovered and stopped pedestrians who had been operating a vehicle on the part of the Defendant in accordance with the second line of two lanes in the international apartment room near H I-distance International Oil Station located in G in the original city. The Plaintiff was driving the vehicle on the part of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff followed the vehicle on the part of the Defendant while driving the vehicle. As such, as the vehicle stopped on the part of the Defendant, the Plaintiff was unable to avoid the vehicle on the part of the Defendant, and the remaining part of the Defendant was at a quasi-stop speed of about 5 km in speed above the right side of the vehicle on the front side of the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). On the other hand, at the time of the said accident, Defendant C and Defendant D, his father, were on the part of the Defendant at the time of the said accident.

C. Defendant B, C, and D asserted that the injury was caused by the instant accident, and Defendant B hospitalized in a L Hospital operated by Defendant F for 12 days from December 26, 2013 to January 6, 2014, under the name of the disease, such as an unidentified salvine, salvine and tension, salvine, and tension. From January 7, 2014 to January 24, 2014, Defendant C hospitalized in the instant L Hospital under the name of the disease, namely, the relevant disease, including the relevant salvine, tension, salvine, salvine, and tension. Defendant C hospitalized in the instant L Hospital for 12 days from December 26, 2013 to January 6, 2014. From January 14, 2014 to January 17, 2014.

In addition, on December 27, 2013, Defendant F issued to Defendant B and C a medical certificate that requires two-day medical treatment under the above name of each of the above two weeks, and issued to Defendant D a medical certificate that requires ten-day medical treatment under the name of the same day’s base base and tension, satum base and tension, satum base and tension.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant medical certificate”). [Ground for recognition] There is no dispute, and evidence Nos. 1 and 2.