logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1985. 9. 10. 선고 84후103 판결
[거절사정][공1985.11.1.(763),1337]
Main Issues

Trademark “SAMYG COFE MAE” as designated goods (negative)

c. Corerc d.s.

Summary of Judgment

This trademark consists of two parts of the main trademark consisting of two parts, and among them, it refers to the food cream at the time of riding coffee. Thus, if the above trademark is used for ew, eggs, spaw, spaw, spaw, etc. which are not related to coffee, it is likely that a general trader or a consumer may be mistaken for the contents of the goods to be cream made in "Tyang", and the above trademark cannot be registered pursuant to Article 9 (1) 11 of the Trademark Act.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 9(1)11 of the Trademark Act

claimant-Appellant

Samyang Food Industry Corporation

Appellant-Appellee

The Commissioner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office

original decision

Korean Intellectual Property Trial Office 1984 dated September 24, 1984

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by a claimant.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The quality of goods stipulated in Article 9 (1) 11 of the former Trademark Act (amended by Act No. 3326 of Dec. 31, 1980) refers to the nature of goods which has the original nature and which trademark indicates the character of the designated goods should be determined in consideration of the concept of the trademark in question, the relationship with the designated goods, and the circumstances of the trade society. Since the decision of the court below consists of two parts of the trademark in question, the applicant trademark in this case, and it is common sense that the trademark in this case means the food of the food of the food of the food of the food of this case, the trademark in this case consists of two parts of the trademark in this case, which means the food of the food of the food of this case, which means the food of the food of the food of this case, which is not related to coffee, eggs, spath, spath, spath, and spath, etc., and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles or incomplete deliberation.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Kim Young-ju (Presiding Justice)

arrow