logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.04.09 2012고단710
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendant shall obtain 46,00 won by fraud from B who is an applicant for compensation, and C who is an applicant for compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. A. Around January 21, 2012, the victim D concluded that “F” in the “F” house of the victim D’s “F” in the “F” house of the victim in Sinpo City E, Ma, “The victim would lend the uniform to the victim within the lending date and pay it when he/she returns the unpaid uniform at KRW 50,000,000.”

However, the defendant did not intend to return his uniform even if he borrowed from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received from the victim one male set of the market price of 100,000 won and one female set of the market price of 40,000 won from the victim, respectively, and acquired them by deception.

B. Around February 1, 2012, the Defendant issued an order to the victim C, a delivery employee of coodart, to the Defendant’s dwelling, to deliver milk and coodart to the Defendant, as if the Defendant would normally pay the coodart to the Defendant’s dwelling, the Defendant ordered the Defendant to deliver milk and coodart during the month in which the Defendant’s dwelling was the Defendant’s dwelling.

In fact, even if the defendant was provided with milk and cushion from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained 2,40,000 won in the market price from February 1, 2012 to February 24, 2012 from the victim, and acquired coote and coote from the victim.

C. Around February 9, 2012, the Defendant ordered soup and brying to the victim as if he would normally pay food values at the “I cafeteria” of the victim G management at H at Y at Mapopo-si.

In fact, even if the defendant was provided with food from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceptioned the victim as above and acquired 5,000 won at the market price from the victim and 5,000 won through a soup and a soup.

A victim B.

arrow