Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant purchased at 2.3 billion won in the auction procedure, two factories located in Pakistan, D, E, F, G, and four warehouses.

The victim H, who is the former owner, claimed the right of retention in the warehouse and factory located in the location, and opened the entrance door of the three warehouses in the above G with locks.

1. On December 6, 2013, the Defendant damaged one locks with which the market price cannot be determined by ordering five persons, such as I, etc., at the three warehouses located in G at the time of strike, at around 15:00 to 16:00, the Defendant: (a) cut off the locks set up at the entrance of the said three warehouses; and (b) cut off the locks set up at the entrance of the said three warehouses; and (c) destroyed one.

2. The Defendant, by ordering five other persons, including I, who may know of the situation at the time, time, and place of the preceding paragraph, intruded the building managed by the victim by cutting the entrance door of the third warehouse managed by the victim, and entering the entrance through the entrance, and intruded the building managed by the victim.

3. At around 15:00 on January 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) instructed the J to know of the circumstances at the above location; and (b) prevented the J from using two sn beam beams equivalent to approximately KRW 690,00 in market price, including one 7-meter 1,5 meters from the victim H, the ownership of the victim H, by allowing the J to use two sn beam beams in the interior of the warehouse building.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of a witness I;

1. Statement made by a witness H in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Statements made by witnessesJ in the fourth trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. The first police statement related to H;

1. The keys or photograph cut;

1. In full view of the following circumstances, each of the facts charged of this case can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the report on internal investigation (on-site investigation, etc.), investigation report (related to the suspected suspect's suspicion), investigation report (related to the submission of photographs), investigation report (related to the submission of photographs), and investigation report (related to the amount of damaged goods). The facts alleged by the Defendant alone alone are erroneous as not constituting a crime of damaging property and larceny.

such mistake shall be deemed to have a reasonable ground.