The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The Defendant is the representative of D (ju), a seller, who is a contractor and a seller of B-Gu, Jung-gu, Seoul, and two parcels of land, and E purchases the above C-A-B-ro. A.

On April 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) printed out a multi-family housing supply contract on the F-family housing of the CY reconstruction building in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu; and (b) as a result of inspection in the column of Article 17, “Article 17 (Matters of Special Agreement”), the Defendant entered “G representative H and I (J)” as the transfer of ownership at the time of completion of the construction; and (c) arbitrarily affixed E seal on the buyer’s “E”.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a multi-family housing supply contract in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.

B. On April 19, 2017, the Defendant submitted to the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court a copy of the output of the falsified multi-family housing supply contract, as described in paragraph (1), as if the completion was duly made, to a public official who was unaware of the forgery, at the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, Seoul.

2. Determination

A. On April 11, 2014, the Defendant asserts that, with the consent of E, K, I, and I, etc., a supply contract written in the facts charged to sell the building F of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the

B. The burden of proving the facts charged in a judgment in a criminal trial is to be borne by the prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence of probative value that makes the judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. As such, such evidence is to be proven.