logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.04.12 2018나109231
인건비 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court's explanation is as follows, except for the addition, replacement, and deletion of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the last sentence of the 11st century, ‘payment’ is added to the second 1-C, i.e., [the payment made on July 7, 2015, August 8, 2015, October 2015, and September 18, 2015 as ‘benefit’].

subsection (d) below:

(d) add a subsection;

In addition, even if the defendant did not pay the actual amount to the plaintiff, it reported to the tax office that the tax amount of KRW 165,000,000 for each of the tax amount of KRW 5 million was withheld at the same amount as that of the previous 5 million on November 2015 and December 2015, and on January 2016 and March 2016, the defendant reported to the tax office that the tax amount of KRW 66,00 was withheld at each of the tax amount of KRW 2 million.

Each “witness” of the Second and Twelves 12 and 13 shall be read as the “witness of the first instance trial,” and each “eight million won” of the third and fourths 3 and 4 shall be read as the “six million won,” respectively.

A. The judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. The third party's appeal is dismissed.

arrow